Please note: If you are presenting at the SOAC Conference, we require your slides to be 4:3 in size.
Call for Abstracts has now closed.
Thank you to all authors who submitted an abstract for the State of Australian Cities conference 2013.
Download the Full Paper Template and guidelines HERE
Download the Call for Papers Document HERE
Although abstract submissions have now closed please be advised that you are still able to log into the speakers portal for updates on your paper.
Abstracts must be no longer than 250 words. All accepted abstracts will be published in the conference handbook and online.
Papers should be the product of original research/analysis. Literature/policy reviews which lack any policy or theoretical insights for the future of Australian cities will not be accepted.
Each delegate is restricted to presenting one paper only. There is no restriction on how many papers an individual might be listed as a co- author.
It is the responsibility of the presenting author to ensure that the abstract is submitted correctly. The conference managers will not be held responsible for abstract submissions not received via the online submission process, or for submission errors caused by internet service outages, hardware or software delays, power outages or unforeseen events. Faxed or mailed abstracts on CD will not be accepted. If you are unable to submit via the website please contact the conference managers via email: email@example.com.
Deadline for Full paper submission is 11 August 2013.
Please see below the following themes for the State of Australian Cities Conference:
• City Economy – economic change and labour market outcomes of globalisation, land use pressures, changing employment locations.
• City Social – people and place, population change and trends, migration, cultural inclusion, social polarisation, equity and disadvantage, housing issues, the healthy city, sport and recreation.
• City Environment – sustainable development, environmental management and performance, natural resource management, limits to growth, air and water quality, climate change mitigation and adaptation, impacts of consumption, natural resource uses, nature conservation, green space.
• City Structure – metropolitan spatial structure, urban form, new development precincts, urban design, place-making, policy implications of development and land use trends.
• City Governance – taxation, provision of urban services, public policy formation, planning, urban government, citizenship and the democratic process.
• City Movement – transport, mobility, accessibility, communications and IT, and other urban infrastructure provision.
All presenting authors who have their papers accepted for presentation must register to attend the conference. SOAC 2013 is unable to offer any financial assistance to submitting authors. Failure to register will result in the withdrawal of the paper. Authors with papers that are rejected following full review, but have already registered, may request a full refund of their registration fee.
All abstract submissions will be subject to double blind review against the following criteria:
• The extent to which the paper addresses the nominated conference theme
• The contribution of the paper to policy/conceptual/empirical understandings of Australian cities
• The extent to which methodological/analytical rigour
Note on peer review process, conference proceedings and future publication
All papers accepted for presentation at the SOAC 2013 Conference will be subject to double blind peer reviewed and must be published in the SOAC Conference Proceedings (if accepted). Papers that are not submitted for inclusion in the final proceedings will be removed from the conference program. Any subsequent submission of modified versions of your paper for publication elsewhere should include the following statement:
“An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2013 State of Australian Cities Conference, Sydney: see http://www.be.unsw.edu.au/research-centres-and-clusters/city-futures/soac”
Peter Harrison Memorial Prizes
The Peter Harrison Memorial Prizes are administered by The Fenner School of Environment and Society and ANU Endowment for Excellence, The Australian National University, in collaboration with the State of Australian Cities Research Network (SOACRN). The Prizes are awarded every two years, being selected from written, refereed papers accepted for presentation at the biennial State of Australian Cities Conference. The purpose of the Prizes is to encourage and recognise outstanding research and scholarship in Australian urban studies, and specifically for work that advances knowledge and capacity for the ecologically sustainable development of Australian cities and regions.
The prizes commemorate the leading practitioner -academic Peter Firman Harrison (1918-1990) and his approach to the planning and development of Australian cities.
Prizes will be awarded for:
• Prize One (Open Category). A paper by an established Australian researcher which is judged to make a distinctive contribution to knowledge and capacity for the sustainable development of Australian cities and regions.
• Prize Two (PhD Scholar Category). A paper by a researcher who was, at the time of paper submission, a PhD student enrolled or awaiting award of a PhD at an Australian university, which is judged to make a distinctive contribution to knowledge and capacity for the sustainable development of Australian cities and regions.
In 2013, each Prize will consist of a Certificate and the sum of AUD$1500. In the case of joint authorship, the Prizes will be shared. The Prizes are enabled by the endowed Peter Harrison Memorial Fund of The Australian National University’s Endowment for Excellence.
Selection Committee. The Selection Committee comprises three senior academics drawn from the Conveners of SOACRN, and chaired by the Director of The Fenner School of Environment and Society, ANU, or nominee. Conveners of SOACRN are representatives from the universities who have hosted and/or provide ongoing, core support to SOAC Conferences.
Eligibility. Papers that have been submitted as refereed papers for the biennial State of Australian Cities Conference, accepted for the conference, and that adhere to the format, length and other requirements for the conference, may be nominated by the author’s and are then eligible to be considered for the Prizes. Invited keynote papers and papers by individuals associated with the judging and award of the Prizes are ineligible.
Process. Authors submitting papers for peer reviewing for the State of Australian Cities Conference will have the option of indicating whether they wish their paper to be considered for the Prizes, and whether for the Open or PhD Scholar Category. Chairs of the Conference Theme Panels will each nominate two (2) Open Category and one (1) PhD Scholar Category papers (or a varied number with due reason and with the agreement of the Chair of the Selection Committee). From that short list of papers, the Selection Committee will determine the papers worthy of being awarded the two Category prizes.
The Selection Committee reserves the right not to award the Prizes in any particular year. In the event that the ACRN ceases to operate or support the Prizes, or that SoAC is not held or ceases as a conference series, the operation of the Prizes will revert to the ANU for reconsideration.
Criteria for the Prizes:
1. Adhering to the format, length and other guidelines for paper submission to the SOAC Conference in the given year.
2. The quality and innovative character of the research reported, assessed against the standards of the peer-reviewed Australian urban studies literature.
3. The presentation and coherence of the written paper.
4. The contribution to the sustainable development of Australian cities and regions including environmental, equity and economic aspects and particularly the integration of these.
Peter Firman Harrison, 1918–1990
Peter was born in Brisbane and grew up in Rose Bay Sydney. He had a hard childhood growing up in the Great Depression. His father, a commercial traveller lost his job and he left school at 14. His first job was in a factory in Woolloomooloo polishing pick handles. The harsh realities of working life were brought home to him when he was laid off on his 18th birthday so that his employer did not have to pay an adult wage. He completed a degree in architecture in a night school course at Sydney Technical College in 1942. His studies resulted in him developing a life-long interest in the work of Walter Burley Griffin. His own experience and acute observations of the realities of commercial life for ordinary people left him with an enduring appreciation of their aspirations and sensibilities.
He served in the RAAF as an Architect/Draftsman from 1942-45. On his discharge he worked with the Department of the Interior, and then as a Draftsman and Planning Officer from 1946-50 in the Cumberland County Council while studying part-time at Sydney University for a Diploma in Town and Country Planning. In 1951 he joined Dennis Winston’s Department of Town Planning at Sydney University as Senior Lecturer and remained there until 1958.
He was very active in the Australian Planning Institute and was a member of the API committee that made a submission in 1955 to the Senate Select Committee on the planning and development of Canberra arguing that the Griffin Plan should be implemented.
The National Capital Development Commission (NCDC) established in 1958 appointed Peter as its first Chief Planner early in 1959. Peter made a strong case for the expansion of Canberra and mounted a vigorous defence of Griffin’s approach and developed the case for the ‘Y’ Plan adopted in 1967.
One of his critical responses to some of the more adventurous planning proposals he dealt with was to apply the mother test as in “Would my Mother live in it?” It was his way of bringing his colleagues back to earth and to the concerns and values of those they planned for. A man of high principle, he was impatient with humbug and dismissed cant and hypocrisy, especially about city planning, in colourful terms.
Peter left the NCDC as First Assistant Commissioner to take up a Fellowship in the Urban Research Unit in the Australian National University in 1967. His Masters Degree thesis on Walter Burley Griffin, was published posthumously by the Australian National Library in 1992. His contribution to Town and Country Planning was recognised by the award in 1972 of the Sidney Luker Memorial Medal.
Although his own published output was prodigious he made few contributions to the debates through academic journals, preferring to try to influence his professional colleagues through professional journals, conference presentations and the popular press. His influence on planning of Australian cities, and especially on Canberra, was profound. Peter’s strong defence of the public interest in urban planning saw him take issue on many occasions with political leaders, senior bureaucrats and private entrepreneurs alike. He had a deep commitment to due process and challenged powerful interests if he felt the public interest was under threat. This led him to resist directions from Ministers if they were not made in the designated formal manner. This aspect of his independent character was not always welcomed by Ministers, senior officials or his peers although he did earn respect for his courage and independence.
He was made a Member of the Order of Australia in 1980 for ‘services to town planning’. His distress at proposals for Canberra’s development led him, in 1985, to resign from the Order. He also resigned his Life Fellowship of the RAIA in 1990 in protest at the policies of the ACT Chapter of the RAIA on the Canberra Metropolitan Plan
Peter lived modestly but was generous to students and colleagues. His contribution to research into Australian cities, often through cooperation with other scholars, was without peer.
All abstract submissions will be subject to double blind review against the
• The extent to which the paper addresses the nominated conference
• The contribution of the paper to policy/conceptual/empirical
of Australian cities
The extent to which methodological/analytical rigour